Tim Brown | Freedom Outpost | Dec. 2, 2017

We already knew the Flynn didn’t tell the truth to Vice President Pence.  That came out when he resigned.  Apparently, the same things were done to the FBI regarding talks he had with the Russian ambassador and Flynn is going along with it for the sake of himself and his family.

Flynn was wrong to have concealed the conversation.  However, was this a real national security measure?  I’m not asking that with the intent to cover for his actions.  If he lied under oath, then sure, deal with him on that, but I’m asking with regard to what we were led to believe about Russian collusion.  This doesn’t have anything to do with election meddling.

“The charging document states that Flynn made a false statement to the FBI when he stated that in December 2016 he did not ask Kislyak “to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the United States had imposed against Russia that same day; and Flynn did not recall the Russian ambassador subsequently telling him that Russia had chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of his request,” reported CNN.

Now, CNN is known as the absolute name you cannot trust in the news media, but at least that part of the report is correct.  However, ABC… that’s a different story.

Here’s ABC’s Brian Ross tweeting, “Michael Flynn promised “full cooperation to the Mueller team” and is prepared to testify that as a candidate, Donald Trump “directed him to make contact with the Russians.”

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/93662856037407129

Liberation Information then reported that Ross’ tweet was fake news and he attempted to cover for the tweet.

Ross said: “And David, a clarification tonight on something one of Flynn’s confidante’s told us and we reported earlier today. He said the President asked Flynn to contact Russia during the campaign. He’s now clarifying that statement, saying, according to Flynn, candidate Trump asked him during the campaign to find ways to repair relations with Russia and other hot spots and then after the election, the President-elect asked him — and told him to contact Russia on other issues, including working together to fight ISIS, David.”

Ross did not “clarify” his nonsense claim that Trump directing Flynn “to make contact with the Russians” supposedly “contradicts all that Donald Trump has said to this point.”

The damage was done by then.  As IL added:

The news went straight to the top of Drudge report and nearly every news site and induced a sharp market sell-off:

ABC later had to “clarify,” which was really correct what Ross tweeted.

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/936760299146956800

“Flynn prepared to testify that President-elect Donald Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians *during the transition* — initially as a way to work together to fight ISIS in Syria, confidant now,” they tweeted.

However, when it comes to openly violating the rights of the people that are supposed to be protected under our Constitution, Obama’s former CIA head, James Clapper, committed perjury on national television and I have to ask where the FBI is at in this matter?

Paul Joseph Watson reports:

During testimony in 2013 in front of a congressional inquiry, Clapper was asked by Senator Ron Wyden if the NSA was collecting “any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans.”

“No, sir,” responded Clapper.

Senator Wyden asked “It does not?”

Director Clapper responded “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly.”

This was proven to be completely fraudulent three months later when whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA was deliberately collecting tens of millions of Americans’ phone call records as well as browsing histories, chat logs, email usage, as well as their physical locations.

Clapper would have had a level of security clearance to know that this was taking place. He committed clear perjury by lying under oath, yet faced no consequences at all.

The double standard when it comes to lying doesn’t even seem to phase the FBI.  Why has Clapper not been arrested and charged with a crime?  Because he’s part of the establishment, plain and simple.

However, understand that there is far more going on here with Flynn in the way of exposing a huge scandal that many people can’t imagine and a lot of it isn’t even being reported in the news right now, but has been reported over the past 4 or 5 years in bits and pieces.  More to come on that very soon.


Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com, SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. He is husband to his “more precious than rubies” wife, father of 10 “mighty arrows”, jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic rifle. Follow Tim on Twitter.


SHARE:


Alex Thomas | The Daily Sheeple | Nov. 25, 2017

The liberal opposition research firm that was paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign to gather disinformation on then candidate Donald Trump paid at least three journalists for work “related” to the probe into supposed Russian influence in the 2016 election, according to the House Intelligence Committee

According to multiple media reports, lawyers representing the committee made the claim against Fusion in a move to force the liberal company to turn over bank transactions involving jouCongressional committees are conducting broad probes into Russia’s 2016 election interference and whether President Trump and his associates colluded.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican, signed a subpoena for Fusion’s bank records. He wanted to determine wrnalists, media companies, and law firms.

That’s right, multiple journalists employed by the mainstream media may have also been taking money indirectly from the Hillary campaign to attack her political opponent.

“The committee seeks transactions related to three individual journalists, each of whom have reported on and/or been quoted in articles regarding topics related to the committee’s investigation,” read the House general counsel court filing.

“Fusion has established a pattern and practice of using law firms as intermediaries to mask the true beneficiaries of its research.”

The journalists names are blacked out in the filing but one can safely assume that they are high-profile establishment journalists who have “broke” multiple stories designed to hurt President Trump. (Can you say Maggie Haberman?)

Documents from the House list ten different bank transactions from Fusion, or its conduits, to the unknown journalists.

The Washington Times reported on the filing from the House while providing background on the entire operation:

Congressional committees are conducting broad probes into Russia’s 2016 election interference and whether President Trump and his associates colluded.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican, signed a subpoena for Fusion’s bank records. He wanted to determine who bankrolled a partisan unproven dossier that has become such a large part of the FBI’s, Congress’ and journalists’ investigations.

The Nunes subpoena forced the law firm Perkins Coie to admit that the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign paid the bills. The money went from Democrats to Perkins Coie to Fusion to ex-British spy Christopher Steele. He then paid Kremlin sources for dirt on Mr. Trump. None of Mr. Steele’s core charges of collusion has been publicly confirmed.

Fusion and the House at first worked out a deal for relevant banks records. But House lawyers say they learned that Fusion withheld 112 transactions pertinent to the Russia probe.

The suspect transactions, House lawyers say, deal with two Russia issues. One is the dossier. The other is Fusion’s payments from another law firm, BakerHostetler. That money came from the Russian firm Prevezon Holdings which is lobbying Washington to repeal a law that brought stiff economic sanctions on President Vladimir Putin’s regime.

The House Committee is also attempting to find out the actual agreement between the Washington Free Beacon and Fusion GPS. The conservative outlet was the first to hire the company but claims to have stopped payments in April 2016 when Fusion then apparently sought funds from Democrats.

For their part, the openly shady Fusion GPS had their attorneys directly assert their disapproval at Congress attempting to find out details about journalists who were paid to spread propaganda designed to alter the presidential election.

The company claimed that if they had not filed their own lawsuit then, “the committee would have happily prowled through all of Fusion‘s banking records and used them for no purpose other than to inflict harm, we respectfully submit that [committee Republicans are] using these overbroad demands to punish [Fusion] for having investigated Mr. Trump.”

In other words, we were paid to hurt Donald Trump, we paid others to do the same, and the real bad guys are the Republicans trying to uncover the rapidly increasing scandal.

In the days and weeks ahead, the American people will hopefully be able to see the exact names of the  journalists (and the news outlets they work for) who were paid to take out Donald Trump.

One can imagine that outlets such as CNN and The New York Times may be involved.


Contributed by Alex Thomas of The Daily Sheeple.

Alex Thomas is a staff writer and reporter for The Daily Sheeple. Wake the flock up – follow Alex’s work at our Facebook or Twitter.


SHARE:

L. Steele | America Uncensored | Nov. 14, 2017

While big corporations like Walmart put on a PR front teaming up with Feeding America, behind the scenes is another story.

Mainstream media pushes the publicity for companies like Walmart, so that you can feel better about spending your hard earned money with the evil empire. Meanwhile, citizens take it upon themselves to tell the real story. Showing us what real journalism should be.

A Walmart in Celina, Ohio was caught throwing away very large amounts of good food. 2 to 3 truckloads of good, unexpired food. The video shows lines of shopping carts full of hams, roasts, hot dogs and other meats. Packaged food, canned foods, milk and even butter filling carts and dumpsters.

After seeing this video, a person should feel ashamed for shopping at Walmart. They prove to have no idea of what “live better” even means. This is no doubt a disgusting truth to swallow.

It is reported that 1 in 5 children in America are going hungry. Absolutely unacceptable! In Ohio, where the video was taken, over 653,000 children are going hungry.

As reported at Deprogram Yourself:

Nearly one in four Ohio children lacks consistent access to adequate food—that’s 653,410 Ohio children of all ages in every corner of the state.

Children are the future of our world, yet we are barely able to feed them. Hunger is a widespread problem, not just in the poor nations of the world, but also in ‘rich’ countries like America. It must not be tolerated and we need to act now.

Wake up America! These starving children need our help. What can you do to help? For starters, you could stop shopping at places like Walmart.

Between the worlds elite, filthy rich corporations, corrupt politicians and Hollywood scum, we could end world hunger by the end of the day. What is stopping us? All those that pretend to care, really don’t.

This subject is more proof that it is not race that divides us, but wealth.


SHARE:

Alex Thomas | SHTFplan | Nov. 11 2017

In what many saw coming a mile away in the aftermath of both the Las Vegas Massacre and the Texas Church mass shooting, liberals in the government, with the help of their mainstream media allies, are now pushing what amounts to plans for gun confiscation, outside of normal law, for Americans across the country.

The new push for gun control from the left comes courtesy of ABC News which recently published a piece promoting the use of an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) that many believe is nothing more than a thinly veiled confiscation plan that would allow a judge to “issue an ex parte order” for the direct confiscation of an American citizens firearms.

Unbelievably, the order can actually be issued without the firearm owner even being present, which would in turn end with police at the citizens door demanding he hand over his weapons or face violence from the state.

ABC’s Andy Fies, on the other hand, apparently wants Americans to see the orders differently, painting a more friendly picture of the ERPO’s while quoting two different left-wing gun control groups as seemingly unbiased experts on gun violence

As of now, only Washington, California, Connecticut and most recently Oregon have ERPO laws (while Indiana and Texas have modified risk warrant statutes). Over the past year, however, spurred by a string of mass shootings beginning with the Pulse Nightclub attack that killed 49 in June 2016, legislatures in 19 states and Washington, D.C., have taken up 32 separate ERPO bills for consideration, according to Everytown for Gun Safety, a nonprofit organization that advocates for gun control.

Everytown’s deputy legal director, William Rosen, told ABC News that list will grow. “We expect to see at least as much interest in 2018,” he said.

“There is a growing consensus,” added Lauren Alfred of the gun violence prevention group Sandy Hook Promise, “that this is the first step we should be taking when we are talking about people who are at risk of hurting themselves or others.”

Current laws barring gun ownership are limited. Generally, a person with a long history of mental health issues can still legally buy or possess firearms if they don’t fall into specific statutory categories such as having been adjudicated mentally ill or under a domestic violence restraining order. But, as was the case with Texas church gunman Devin Kelley, even these restrictions may not work if the person’s troubled past is not recorded on a background registry.

With an ERPO, however, if family members or police can show a gun owner to be an imminent danger to themselves or others, they can force the person to surrender their weapon(s).

Keep in mind that Everytown for Gun Safety is a Michael Bloomberg funded, left-wing gun control group that was created as part of a rebranding effort by the billionaire gun grabber after his previous group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, was outed by multiple former members as actually pushing an agenda of full-scale gun confiscation.

The Extreme Risk Protection Orders scheme seems to be nothing more than another attempt at slowly eroding the right of lawful Americans to own firearms.

As AWR Hawkins reported in an April 2017 article about a similar law being pushed in Oregon, “Oregon state Sen. Brian Boquist (R-Dallas) is pushing a confiscation bill that would broaden the number of prohibited gun purchasers as well as require certain individuals to hand over any guns in their possession.”

At the time, gun rights activist and NRA member Keely Hopkins rightfully described the law as an attempt to remove your Second Amendment rights by using a third-party who would need little evidence to declare you unfit to own a firearm. (Imagine a vengeful ex-wife/husband)

“This bill allows for a protective order to remove your Second Amendment rights, not because of a criminal conviction, but based on third-party allegations using an evidentiary standard that falls far below what’s normally required for the removing of fundamental rights.”

It is also important to note that gun control advocates and the mainstream media are using The Las Vegas Massacre, which the authorities are openly lying about (there were at least 7 different shooters) as a pretext to further take away Americans right to bear arms. This is, and has always been, the modus operandi of the power elite.


Originally Published @ SHTFplan.com


L. Steele | America Uncensored | Nov. 3, 2017

With all the mass killings happening in America recently, it is clear we are at war. If you can’t see that the United States is at war on American soil, you may be consuming too much Mainstream Media.

The last three mass murders in America have brought to light many important questions. Very important questions that are being ignored by the MSM. They have put more importance on their opinions of Donald Trump than they have for the facts coming from these attacks.

Following the October 31st attack in New York, President Trump called for the execution of Sayfullo Saipov, the terrorist who used a rented truck to kill Americans.

Whether or not you agree with the Presidents statement is on you. What can’t be ignored is what happened after Trump made his opinion public.

Liberal reporters were quick to point out Trump’s biased and racist remarks, as they see it. Opening their thoughts for the world to see the depths of liberal ignorance. Three separate reporters weighed in condemning the President for not calling for the same punishment for the already dead Las Vegas shooter.

Elham Khatami, editor for Think Progress, was quick to fire back at Trump’s hatred for Islamic Terrorists. She wonders why he said no such thing for Stephen Paddock?

Up next to bat, for team GQ Magazine, Jay Willis. He points out Trump’s hypocrisy by wondering why Donald only wants the Death Penalty for ISIS members?

But wait, there’s more! As if Khatami and Willis were not doing enough to raise awareness of Trump’s Islamic profiling, a heavyweight enters the arena to confirm mainstream liberal logic.

Straight out of WSJ and MSNBC, Eli Stokols comes out swinging with his confirmation of the importance of executing the dead.

These reporters have lots to say when it comes to Trump calling for an end to Islamic Terrorism, but remain silent about the mass misinformation surrounding the Vegas massacre. Feeding their ignorant opinions out to liberals nationwide, while looking the other way from truth.