China’s Human Coronavirus Plan Exposed In 2015



A shocking report may be further proof the Coronavirus pandemic was intentional. The report shows China’s plan to infect humans already exposed in 2015. Video released in November 2015 by Italian media shows Chinese scientists doing experiments with the virus.

GreatGameIndia Reports:

Five years ago, Italian state owned media Company, Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana, exposed dark efforts by China on viruses. The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms.

Below is a transcription of the Italian broadcast translated in English.

Chinese Biological Experiments

Chinese scientists have created a pulmonary supervirus from bats and mice only for study reasons but there are many questionable aspects to this. Is it worth the risk? It’s an experiment, of course, but it is worrisome. It worries many scientists: It is a group of Chinese researchers attaching a protein taken from bats to the SARS virus, Acute Pneumonia, derived from mice. The output is a super coronavirus that could affect man. It remains closed in laboratories and it is only for study purposes, but is it worth the risk – creating such a great threat only for examination purposes?

The debate about the risks of research is as old as science itself. Like the myth of Icarus, who plunged from the Sky and perished in the sea, having gone too close to the Sun with the wings of wax designed by his father!

Here is an experiment in China, in which a group of scientists has managed to develop a chimera – an organism modified by attaching the surface protein of a coronavirus found in bats of the common species called the Great Horseshoe Bat, to a virus that causes SARS in mice, although in a non-fatal form. It was suspected that the protein could make the chimeric hybrid organism suitable for affecting humans, and the experiment confirmed it.

This supports “conspiracy theories” that COVID-19 is the result of China releasing a bio-weapon, while proving USA Today‘s fact check’s worthless.

  The claim is that the coronavirus began in a Chinese laboratory. We rate this claim FALSE, based on our research. Overwhelming scientific evidence suggests the coronavirus originated in nature, and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise. ~USA Today 

The claim is that official fact checkers are reliable. We rate this claim FALSE, based on the obvious.

Clearly a strain of coronavirus was developed in a Chinese laboratory. To believe they would not release it on their own people would be ignorance. USA Today claims the coronavirus originated in nature which is likely true. However, the form of the virus currently circulating is not our normal coronavirus. The overwhelming evidence is that these deadly strains of this virus was created by manipulating nature.

[Trending:  Biometric Vaccines Are Here Preceding Forced Digital ID

While no evidence can prove nature as the culprit, mounting evidence points to a lab in China. 

On Nov. 18, the lab posted a job opening that requested scientists to come “research the relationship between the coronavirus and bats.”

Then, just over a month later on Dec. 24, the lab posted another job opening, this time noting “long-term research on the pathogenic biology of bats carrying important viruses has confirmed the origin of bats of major new human and livestock infectious diseases such as SARS and SADS, and a large number of new bat and rodent new viruses have been discovered and identified.”

At the time of the second job posting, China had reportedly been dealing with an onslaught of “mystery pneumonia” cases, but it wasn’t until a week later that the Chinese government notified the World Health Organization about a novel coronavirus infecting its population. ~ (the Blaze)

If the question is if China created a coronavirus that has infected humans? The answer is Yes. 



%d bloggers like this: